Safe harbour is a defence for company directors against personal liability for insolvent trading. It is set out in section 588GA of the Corporations Act 2001. It protects a director who, once they suspect the company may be insolvent, starts developing a course of action that is reasonably likely to lead to a better outcome for the company than appointing an administrator or liquidator straight away. It only applies while employee entitlements are being paid and tax lodgements are up to date. It only covers debts incurred in connection with that course of action. It is not a general licence to keep trading.
Under section 588G, a director can be personally liable for debts a company incurs while it is insolvent, if there were reasonable grounds to suspect insolvency. Before 2017, that risk pushed many directors to appoint an administrator or liquidator at the first sign of trouble, even when the business could have been saved.
Safe harbour was introduced in September 2017 to change that incentive. It gives directors room to attempt a genuine restructure or turnaround outside formal insolvency, with the help of qualified advisers, without carrying personal liability for the debts incurred while they do it.
The protection starts when a director, suspecting the company may be or may become insolvent, starts developing one or more courses of action that are reasonably likely to lead to a better outcome for the company. “Better outcome” means better than the immediate appointment of an administrator or liquidator.
It covers debts incurred directly or indirectly in connection with that course of action. It ends at the earliest of these points:
The plan does not have to succeed for the protection to apply. What matters is whether, at the time each debt was incurred, the course of action was still reasonably likely to produce a better outcome.
Safe harbour is not available if, when the debt is incurred, the company is:
The second condition is about lodging, not paying. A company with an ATO debt can still be within safe harbour if its lodgements are current. A company that has stopped paying super cannot be.
The company’s books and records also need to be in order. If a director later fails to hand books or information over to a liquidator or administrator when required, section 588GB can stop that material being used to support a safe harbour defence.
Section 588GA(2) lists factors a court may consider. They are indicators, not a checklist, but each one is worth being able to show. Has the director:
ASIC’s updated Regulatory Guide 217 sets out how it expects directors to apply these factors, with practical examples. Its consistent theme is that a plan built with qualified advice, and monitored as circumstances change, is far easier to defend than one put together alone.
| Safe harbour | Small Business Restructuring | Voluntary administration | |
| Who is in control | Directors, with advisers | Directors, with a restructuring practitioner | An independent administrator |
| Formal appointment | No | Yes | Yes |
| Stops creditor action | No | Yes, a moratorium applies | Yes, a moratorium applies |
| Public | No | Yes, notified to ASIC | Yes, notified to ASIC |
| Main use | Informal turnaround while the business keeps trading | A deal with creditors for small businesses with liabilities under $1 million | Larger or more complex restructures, or where a DOCA is likely |
These are not always alternatives. A safe harbour plan often concludes that a formal process gives the better outcome. The protection then helps cover the period in which the director worked that out. SBR also carries its own separate safe harbour, under section 588GAAB, for debts incurred during the restructuring.
Our registered liquidators act as safe harbour advisers for directors of small and medium businesses. That means reviewing the financial position, testing whether a better outcome is achievable, and documenting the plan. If informal restructuring is not enough, we advise on Small Business Restructuring, voluntary administration or an orderly liquidation. The first consultation is free and confidential, and we can explain things in English, Mandarin, Cantonese or Korean. Sydney (02) 8318 3699, Brisbane (07) 3868 1888.
A defence under section 588GA of the Corporations Act that protects directors from personal liability for insolvent trading. It applies while they develop and take a course of action that is reasonably likely to lead to a better outcome for the company than an immediate administration or liquidation.
Yes, if the company’s tax lodgements are up to date. The condition is about reporting, not payment. Unpaid super or wages, however, rule safe harbour out.
No. Personal liability under the Director Penalty Notice regime is separate, and safe harbour does not cover it.
There is no fixed time limit. It ends when the course of action stops, stops being reasonably likely to lead to a better outcome, is not taken within a reasonable period, or when an administrator or liquidator is appointed.
The law does not strictly require one. However, getting advice from an appropriately qualified entity is one of the main factors a court considers, and ASIC’s guidance stresses its importance.
No. Safe harbour protects directors personally. It does not stop creditors from pursuing the company. A moratorium on creditor action only comes with a formal process such as SBR or voluntary administration.
No. Unlike SBR or voluntary administration, there is no public notice or ASIC lodgement.
Sources: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 588G, 588GA, 588GAAB and 588GB; ASIC Regulatory Guide 217 Duty to prevent insolvent trading; Treasury, Review of the Insolvent Trading Safe Harbour (2022). This page is general information, not advice about your circumstances. Last reviewed: 1 October 2026.
Written by Patrick Loi, Director and Registered Liquidator. Patrick has more than 20 years’ experience in corporate restructuring and insolvency and founded Greengate Advisory. Meet the team.